PROstate cancer Multimodal Explainable Transferable Holistic Expert for Universal Stratification (PROMETHEUS)
PROMETHEUS is a European research consortium developing next-generation decision support for precision medicine in prostate cancer. The project integrates imaging, clinical data, and analytical methods into a unified framework for personalized diagnosis and treatment selection. PROMETHEUS is funded by the European Innovation Council (EIC Pathfinder).
Multimodal decision support for personalized prostate cancer care PROMETHEUS combines MRI, PSMA PET/CT, and longitudinal health records to generate patient-specific disease profiles. By integrating these data into disease trajectory models, the project enables more accurate identification of aggressive disease and supports the selection of appropriate treatment strategies.
The system provides transparent risk assessments with quantified uncertainty and clear links to underlying evidence. The approach aims to reduce unnecessary biopsies and overtreatment, and is validated across large European clinical cohorts
Work packages
WP1: Integration of multi-cohort clinical data Harmonizes imaging, clinical, and outcome data from multiple centers into a unified dataset. Creates the foundation for robust analyses by ensuring data quality, consistency, and interoperability across sites.
WP1.1: Establish compliant data access and governance WP1.2: Harmonize and curate multimodal datasets
WP2: Multi-modal agent fundamentals Defines the technical and methodological foundation for combined data analysis across modalities. Enables consistent integration and comparison of imaging, clinical and longitudinal patient data.
WP2.1: Establish benchmarking and experimental infrastructure WP2.2: Define architecture for integrated data analysis
WP3: Knowledge-based decision support Links clinical data to guidelines and evidence to support structured decision-making. Ensures that analyses are aligned with established clinical knowledge and current best practice.
WP3.1: Build a structured knowledge base from guidelines and studies WP3.2: Connect clinical data to evidence-based decision pathways
WP4: Clinical decision support interface Develops tools for presenting patient data, risk assessments and evidence in a clear clinical context. Facilitates interpretation and use of results in routine clinical decision-making.
WP4.1: Integrate results into a clinician-facing dashboard WP4.2: Enable interactive exploration of patient data and evidence
WP5: Diagnostic modelling Develops models to identify clinically significant prostate cancer and support biopsy decisions. Focuses on improving detection of aggressive disease while reducing unnecessary procedures.
WP5.1: Detect and classify lesions across imaging modalities WP5.2: Estimate risk of clinically significant disease
WP6: Diagnostic evaluation and optimisation Validates and refines diagnostic performance across datasets. Ensures robustness, reliability and clinical relevance of diagnostic models.
WP6.1: Optimise model performance and robustness WP6.2: Evaluate accuracy and clinical utility
WP7: Treatment stratification Develops models to support selection among treatment strategies. Enables prediction of outcomes to guide personalised treatment decisions.
WP7.1: Model patient trajectories and outcomes WP7.2: Compare outcomes across treatment options
WP8: Treatment model evaluation Assesses performance and usability of treatment stratification tools. Ensures that models are clinically meaningful and applicable in practice.
WP8.1: Validate across clinical cohorts WP8.2: Evaluate impact on treatment decisions
WP9: External validation Tests performance and generalisability in independent real-world cohorts. Confirms applicability across different populations, healthcare systems and data sources.
WP10: Synthetic data generation Develops methods to generate realistic data for development and validation. Supports data sharing and method development while preserving patient privacy.
WP10.1: Generate synthetic imaging and clinical data WP10.2: Assess quality and representativeness
WP11: Model optimisation and sustainability Improves efficiency and evaluates resource use for clinical implementation. Ensures that methods are scalable, cost-effective and suitable for long-term use.
WP11.1: Optimise computational performance WP11.2: Assess environmental and operational impact
Partners
Magdalena Görtz
German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Andreas Josefsson
Umeå University, Translational Research Center, Umeå, Sweden
Sigrid Carlsson
German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Ralf Floca
German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Klaus Maier-Hein
German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Karin Welén
University of Gothenburg,
Gothenburg, Sweden
Monique Roobol
Erasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam,
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Olof Akre
Karolinska Institutet,
Stockholm, Sweden
Per Vincent
Karolinska Institutet,
Stockholm, Sweden
Oskar Aspegren
Karolinska Institutet,
Stockholm, Sweden
Jürgen Fütterer
Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
Katharina Beyer
Erasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam,
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Keno März
German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany